tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1375677198071754693.post4772773165788908244..comments2023-08-17T04:52:41.012-07:00Comments on Chinese politics from the provinces: Cambridge Stands For ComplicityAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13371969246613017865noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1375677198071754693.post-79354944307554086722017-09-14T01:24:12.797-07:002017-09-14T01:24:12.797-07:00I meant to reply to your cogent and entirely corre...I meant to reply to your cogent and entirely correct comment earlier. I think you express the issue very well indeed. I will also note that another feature of this matter is how certain academics came out to support CUP as an institution in the days following their turnaround--almost as if the original decision to knuckle under to SARFT never happened. I suspect that in the months to come, there will be a myth out there that CUP took a courageous stand, with some even thinking that they did so from the outset. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13371969246613017865noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1375677198071754693.post-81747573089364530882017-08-22T03:28:21.121-07:002017-08-22T03:28:21.121-07:00So Cambridge University Press eventually stood up ...So Cambridge University Press eventually stood up to China (or caved under the pressure of protesting academics). I wonder which other journals yield to the demands of SARFT quietly. The reality is that very few academics within China actually read or write on those subject matters that the SARFT deem to be sensitive. Those who do are already based outside of China. At the end of the day the SARFT merely created a Streisand effect. Not that the SARFT care about the negative press though. pHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02814430993852243933noreply@blogger.com